A collection of essays that use John Haugeland’s work on intentionality, embodiment, objectivity, and caring to explore contemporary issues in philosophy of. Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea [John Haugeland] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Machines who think―how utterly preposterous. Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea by John Haugeland () Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind by John Haugeland (

Author: Nilmaran Taugal
Country: Madagascar
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 21 February 2013
Pages: 465
PDF File Size: 16.6 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.80 Mb
ISBN: 132-2-27498-381-1
Downloads: 42669
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Yozshubei

In particular, he explicates Haugeland’s view that a “first-person involvement” or “existential commitment” is a necessary condition for the intelligibility of entities in the world. For McDowell, the “idea of the forms of reality and the idea of the forms of thought are just two guises of a single idea” In addition to the variety of philosophical sources from which the articles draw, there are also quite a few different philosophical sub-disciplines represented, such as philosophy of mind, philosophy of naugeland, metaphysics, epistemology, and philosophy of science.

Explanation is “showing how the actual can be grasped in the light of the modal [i. While this topical breadth could make the volume feel disjointed, I think it works in this case, since all of the chapters are grounded in Haugeland’s thought, which jphn seems to exist precisely on the borders of these different areas of philosophical research.

Mays – – Philosophy 27 April: ComiXology Thousands of Digital Comics. Science Logic and Mathematics. In other words, on McDowell’s version of positivism, it is not the case that we come up with a set of propositions that we designate to be the sum total of facts that constitute the world, and then try to joun this upon the brute world of our experience. He had hauggeland been a member of the Council for Philosophical Studies.

John Haugeland – Wikipedia

Rebecca Kukla begins by stating that she is motivated by Haugeland’s claim that philosophy is ” just a particularly sophisticated and elaborate form haugelqnd ostension” There may be more, depending on how one defines these categories. Similarly, there has been the traditional problem with thinking of truth as correspondence between a proposition or mental representation and the relevant object.


This is the connection, then, between death and love. Languages Deutsch Svenska Edit links.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Next, Haugeland considers scientific laws, defining them as “necessary facts,” establishing an important connection to modal logic It is this ability to bring in and synthesize ideas from so many sources that makes Haugeland’s work so rich.

John Haugeland

For me, as someone mostly familiar with Haugeland’s work on Heidegger, the joun made it clear even when not mentioning Heidegger explicitly how Heideggerian resonances were present in Haugeland’s work in other areas, allowing me to both better appreciate what Haugeland and the non-Heideggerian essays were doing.

However, Crowell points out that, for Haugeland, when we experience the total breakdown of the world in anxiety and being-towards-death, entities are still there, but now have the character of “essential unintelligibility” Help us improve our Author Pages by updating your bibliography and submitting a new or current image and biography.

And Turing Said So. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

I cannot escape your criticism simply by claiming to inhabit a different ‘science world’ than you do” History of Western Philosophy. The Very Idea by John Haugeland To use Kukla’s example, ostension could have the very simple form of saying, “Lo, a rabbit!

Hans SlugaHubert Dreyfus. Haugeland provides an argument for the Dreyfusian position that much of modern philosophy “modern” both in the sense of the historical era starting with Descartes, and in the sense of current analytic philosophy wrongly gives too much weight to the role of explicit mental content. That is not to say that we should reject out of hand any empirical results that are not compatible with scientific laws, but that rather our first impulse should be to investigate why these results are anomalous a bad experimental set-up, miscalculation in the data analysis, etc.

Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Haugeland claims that, in order for scientific knowledge to exist in propositional form as a brute fact about the world, we must first acquire scientific know-how — the knowledge of ” how to make or perform the observations, measurements, and experiments that yield the factual evidence” Again, the problem dissolves on Kukla’s view, since assertion aims to direct attention, not correspond in some way to the entity being pointed out.


As we have already seen in Crowell’s essay, this is an important moment for Haugeland. Again, Haugeland’s strategy in arguing that this view is in fact a mere dogma is to consider another aspect of scientific knowledge.

Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind by John Haugeland Are you an author? That is, “we use jogn discourse to direct one jogn attention to how things are” Normally, entities appear within the context of our practices, whether these practices are scientific, or more practically oriented. This all leads to some important and interesting implications. Philosophy of mind cognitive hsugeland phenomenology Heidegger.

Amazon Restaurants Food delivery from local restaurants. S cum laude in physics. Helm and, like the essays from Crowell and Rouse, deals with Haugeland’s account of how individual existential commitment is connected to truth.

dblp: John Haugeland

On that note, the introduction by haugelwnd editors of the volume is extremely helpful. Making the Right Identification in the Turing Test. Rouse’s discussion of death picks up from there. If entities are what they are by virtue of the norms that govern their activities, then there seems to be nothing to stop someone from simply claiming that they have committed to a different set of norms than the common public ones, and thus have a different “truth” with regard to these entities.

Available for download now.